A Star Trek horror game is just wild enough to work, but not the one Bloober Team is making
🖥 PCNews
🎮 A Star Trek horror game🎮 but not the one Bloober Team#Horror#Games

A Star Trek horror game is just wild enough to work, but not the one Bloober Team is making

PC Gamer RSS FeedFraser Brown6 min read(3 months ago)

Overview & Key Takeaways

A Star Trek horror game is just wild enough to work, but not the one Bloober Team is making

Bloober Team is making a Star Trek game, we discovered over the weekend. It will feature badass bajoran Ro Laren, and yes it's a horror game. It's a combination of genre, developer and licence that could only be the product of throwing darts at a board. Maybe a drunken game of Mad Libs.

Sometimes it's nice to be completely surprised. But sometimes that surprise is 'Bloober Team is making a Star Trek horror game'.

Fraser Brown

Star Trek is one of the few media properties that I am simply incapable of being cool about, which means I end up forcing myself to play a lot of bad Star Trek games and then feeling sad about it. I have a feeling that's about to happen again.

Star Trek: Shadow Frontier | Announcement Teaser - YouTube Star Trek: Shadow Frontier | Announcement Teaser - YouTube

Watch On

It's weird to be protective of brands, but I confess I did feel a genuine spark of annoyance at the news. Star Trek is fertile ground for games, but it's been underutilised, leaving us with only a meagre handful of good adaptations. My knee jerk response was "This is a huge waste." And I haven't really changed my mind.

Latest Videos From

I've never gotten on with Bloober Team's brand of horror, and I don't think horror is a great fit for Star Trek, but I confess I am fascinated all the same. Videogame adaptations can be—but rarely are—a great way to explore existing TV, movie and literary properties and recontextualise them. There are so many things games can do that other mediums cannot, and that opens the door to all kinds of interesting takes.

Nobody wants to have lizard babies growing inside them.

So I'm genuinely intrigued to see what a Star Trek horror game looks like, but at the same time I do wonder who this is actually for? With Star Trek's cultural cachet sadly dwindling, who but those already invested in the shows are going to be throwing their cash at it? Shows that hardly ever dabbled in horror.

The exception to this tends to be episodes that feature either the Borg Collective or, much later, the Gorn Hegemony. The Borg Collective is pretty much the perfect Star Trek villain—a cyborg species that takes the principles of the Federation and twists them into something incredibly disturbing. The gorn, meanwhile, are kinda dumb, but Strange New Worlds tried really hard to make them terrifying. Nobody wants to have lizard babies growing inside them.

(Image credit: Paramount Games)

And yeah, First Contact is definitely horror adjacent, with scenes that wouldn't look out of place in a full-blown horror flick. Its status as arguably the best Star Trek film undermines my argument a bit, granted, but it also cushioned its more horror-inspired moments between classic Trek. It never fully committed to the horror because it still needed to be Star Trek.

Keep up to date with the most important stories and the best deals, as picked by the PC Gamer team.

The thing is, horror not in Star Trek's DNA. Nor is Bloober Team's usual approach to horror, with games that tend to offer a pessimistic perspective, which flies in the face of Star Trek's unrelenting optimism. That, at least, makes Ro Laren a good choice for the protagonist, as she's one of the least Starfleet characters to ever don the uniform. She's more akin to a lone wolf action hero with a chip on their shoulder.

So that's one choice Bloober Team has made that actually kinda makes sense. But Ro is an outlier. And a focus on just her exploits, this unconventional rebel, doesn't feel very Star Trek. Indeed, that was the whole point of Ro. She was designed to serve as the opposite of Starfleet's ideals. She didn't fit in, until Picard started mentoring her and she eventually put her ego aside—temporarily.

If we go back six years, though, I wouldn't have been particularly optimistic about a Star Trek comedy show—especially after The Orville fumbled the brief, at least initially—and now I'm mourning the end of Star Trek: Lower Decks, one of the all-time best Treks.

(Image credit: Paramount Games)

The show's writers found a way to celebrate Star Trek and tell new but classic-feeling yarns through the lens of sci-fi absurdity. It still felt Trek, and it still felt properly canon, all while doing something dramatically different. This suggests that Star Trek is actually broad enough to support dipping into wildly different genres—but Lower Decks, just like First Contact, also featured so many of the critical components of a great Trek show.

Maybe some horror would actually be good for Star Trek.

We got the adventure of the week format, the focus on teamwork, loads of high-concept sci-fi nonsense, quality inter-personal drama—something that took Star Trek a bit of time to figure out, but when it did it went hard—and countless other elements.

So I guess there's no reason the same couldn't be said for horror. Maybe some horror would actually be good for Star Trek. But this specific kind of horror? Ro's flying solo, stranded on a deadly alien world, which just doesn't sound like it's going to leave much room for the things that make Star Trek what it is, rather than just a setting you can slap any old story onto—like Star Wars.

A 45 minute episode? Sure, I could see that. A change in pace, a wee detour, but then back to the Enterprise next week, where the crew is addicted to a rubbish VR game or Picard's belting out some Shakespeare while he's on the phone to a ferengi. Hours and hours of it, though? I'm sceptical.

(Image credit: Paramount Games)

I think Ro Laren's great. I'm excited for more Ro Laren. And I'm totally here for studios doing deep cuts, delving into specific characters who weren't really part of the main cast. I'm just not convinced Bloober Team is the studio for the job. Despite how well regarded Silent Hill 2 Remake is, without the bones of another game to fall back on, I fear a return to cheap jump scares and trite pschological horror.

The good news is that this isn't Star Trek's only hope. We showed off Star Trek: Outposts Unknown, a colony builder, during the PC Gaming Show. And we've always got Star Trek Online, which continues to be brilliant (if a bit creaky). The final frontier is still spitting out adventures, even if Ro's excursion to a cursed world ends up being a bit of a stumble.

Share:

More in PC

Someone made a copper gaming PC Frankensteined out of an old blowtorch and other assorted parts and is 'just going to let it tarnish over time'🖥 PC

Someone made a copper gaming PC Frankensteined out of an old blowtorch and other assorted parts and is 'just going to let it tarnish over time'

It lives!

PCNewsabout 1 hour ago
Wardogs Players Really Want You To Close The Doors … Or Else🖥 PC, Multi-platform

Wardogs Players Really Want You To Close The Doors … Or Else

The hottest game on PC right now is Wardogs(https://www.gamespot.com/games/wardogs/), the Battlefield-like mass multiplayer FPS by developer Bulkhead that's soaring up the Steam charts. While it may not be as hot as the game itself, the game's subreddit is full of hotheads demanding you do one teeny-tiny thing. Close. The. Doors. Behind. You. Released in a closed beta state in August 2026 before entering early access in September 2026, Wardogs has taken PC gaming by storm. It's not only the number-one trending game(https://steamdb.info/stats/trendingfollowers/) according to SteamDB, with an all-time peak of 428,666 concurrent players on September 13(https://steamdb.info/app/1867240/charts/), but it's also the fourth-most-played game on Steam(https://steamdb.info/charts/), trailing behind Counter-Strike 2, Dota 2, and PUBG: Battlegrounds. Folks can't get enough of being a dog of war. Something folks would love to get enough of, though? Players leaving those gosh-darn doors and gates open when venturing out onto the battlefield. All over the official Wardogs subreddit are a ton of players decrying the carelessness of other players when it comes to not closing doors and gates behind them. Redditor demonmit1 posted on September 14(https://www.reddit.com/r/WarDogs/comments/1wfvgws/stopbuildingsomanygates/), pleading for people to stop building so many gates and close the ones they open. "If you're helping build a FOB, please… We only need one air locked gate for logistics," demonmit1 said. "No one closes them anyways, so adding more is not good. Stop it. If someone wants to leave the base, they can jump over a wall. They don't need to leave through a door they'll forget to close." https://www.reddit.com/r/WarDogs/comments/1wdpm7n/closeyourfobgatesplease/ "PSA: stop leaving my doors and gates open at my fobs," wrote Redditor novastar17 on September 12(https://www.reddit.com/r/WarDogs/comments/1we3cmr/psastopleavingmydoorsandgatesopenatmy/). "i have been trying to build mortar complexes and random allies come open doors and let enemies in to just wipe all of us while im busy building. stop that, thanks." "There should be upgraded doors / gates that auto shut after a few seconds," user GOpencyprep suggested on August 23(https://www.reddit.com/r/WarDogs/comments/1vwmx4f/spendingsomuchtimebuildingupafobonlyto/) in a very potty-mouthed Reddit post. "Or teammates who forget to close the door behind them should be fired into the sun...one or the other. Seriously though this is a problem." What these FOBBs, or Forward Operating Base builders(https://www.gamespot.com/articles/what-is-a-fob-in-wardogs-and-why-do-you-need-one/), are talking about are the doors and gates you can add when constructing bases that act as central operating hubs for your team. These FOBs allow you to create fortified defenses, as well as construct weapons and other armaments to keep your team ready for when the fighting gets particularly intense. Unfortunately, because the doors and the gates don't close behind you once opened, this gives the enemy team the opportunity to waltz in, shoot up the place, and leave as if they were invited in the first place. Even though only you and your teammates can open and close doors and gates, meaning the enemy can't just pry your FOB open, leaving any access point open leaves you, ahem, open to a raid. You can imagine how frustrating this would be. https://www.reddit.com/r/WarDogs/comments/1wf7gwf/friendlytutorialonhowtoclosedoors/ "While Servers are down CLOSE THE DAMN DOORS," Redditor xMrStonex put it bluntly on September 14(https://www.reddit.com/r/WarDogs/comments/1wfxm4d/whileserversaredownclosethedamndoors/). "Title. Thank you." "I get killed so often when using mortars or working on the FOB, because lazy people can't be bothered to close the door when they leave the FOB," AutomaticReach32 suggested on September 14(https://www.reddit.com/r/WarDogs/comments/1wfdd2x/paypeopleforclosingdoors/). "You can't force people to close the doors, but I think this could be helped with some monetary encouragement. Pay people if they close the door behind them! Nothing game changing, something modest like the revive / heal tips, $15 to players who close the door, reward good behavour!!" "I just have to say one thing," Icy-Sock-2388 said in the title of their September 5 Reddit post(https://www.reddit.com/r/WarDogs/comments/1w8fihl/ijusthavetosayonething/). "CLOSE THE FING DOORS! Countless times now I've meticulously spent tens of thousands to rapidly build a mortar, AA, and respawn fob...only for it to be taken by the enemy because they casually walked through the front door, past the multi-layered airlocks, into the tower airlock, and then into the fob airlock room because EVERY one of those doors was open." There have been some threats in the subreddit(https://www.reddit.com/r/WarDogs/comments/1wbhwt7/theonlyrealwayoffixingtheproblemofpeople/), too! It's really just people announcing that, if you leave a FOB door or gate open, you'll get a chest full of lead from your own team(https://www.reddit.com/r/WarDogs/comments/1wdpm7n/closeyourfobgatesplease/) if the enemy team hasn't pumped you full of it already. Clearly, no one wants to let the AC out and the enemies in. Speaking of being let in, Wardogs suffered brutal server queues(https://www.gamespot.com/articles/wardogs-has-a-massive-start-on-steam-but-players-face-brutal-sever-queues/) once it entered early access. Thankfully, Bulkhead released a hotfix that kinda-sorta addresses the long server wait times, but you may still encounter the dreaded WD-L014 Error Code. We've broken down how to get past that(https://www.gamespot.com/articles/how-to-fix-the-wardogs-wd-l014-error-code/) so you can be a dog of war again.

GameSpotNewsabout 1 hour ago
YouTuber gets classic Tomb Raider running on a chip that sips a mere 1 W of power🖥 PC

YouTuber gets classic Tomb Raider running on a chip that sips a mere 1 W of power

Who needs an RTX 5090, am I right?

🎮 YouTuber
PCNewsabout 2 hours ago