Helldivers 2 will evolve major orders into galactic war campaigns later this month, with huge changes to mission distribution and Super Destroyers also in the works
๐Ÿ–ฅ PCNews
๐ŸŽฎ Helldivers๐ŸŽฎ Helldivers 2#Action#Games

Helldivers 2 will evolve major orders into galactic war campaigns later this month, with huge changes to mission distribution and Super Destroyers also in the works

PC Gamer RSS Feedโœ Rick Laneโฑ 3 min read(3 months ago)

Overview & Key Takeaways

Better ship customisation is also coming to Arrowhead's sci-fi shooter.

Following yet another post-update drubbing from the Helldivers 2 community, Arrowhead has announced it is making sweeping changes to numerous parts of its sci-fi shooter. Of these, one of the studio's more interesting plans is overhauling the sense of progression in its live-service experience, both for individual players and the wider galactic war.

Arrowhead sketched out some of these ideas in a message to the community, but now the studio has published a more detailed article explaining its plans for the future of the galactic war. There's a lot to dig into, but in short, there are big changes ahead for major orders, fighting on planets, and how players improve their ships.

Let's start with the galactic war, where one of Arrowhead's main objectives is to give players a better sense of the impact they have upon it. "It's never been clear if the actions of the community lead to different outcomes, or if it's just smoke and mirrors," writes game director Mikael Erikson. "The reality is that the community impact on the Galactic War differs, but even in the cases where we did a lot of work to prepare for very different outcomes, we've struggled to communicate it in the game."

Latest Videos From

As such, Arrowhead is launching what it calls "galactic war campaigns" later this month. Describing these as an "evolution" of the current major orders, these will be longer objectives that take place over one to three weeks. According to Erikson, the intention here is that "it will always be clear what the active Campaign is, how it's going, what the outcomes have been, and what's at stake."

In addition, longer campaigns will come with better rewards that go beyond the usual dollop of medals that I always struggle to spend. Erikson says Arrowhead plans to experiment with these, but they'll range from "gameplay altering effects to cool items"

(Image credit: Arrowhead Game Studios)

That's Arrowhead's plan at the galactic scale. But once campaigns are in effect, changes will also be made at the planetary level, via the introduction of planet warfronts. These will reshuffle mission distribution along a dynamically changing frontline, letting you fight defensive missions in Super Earth-controlled territory, battle directly on the front line, or dive into enemy territory to embark upon dangerous behind-enemy-lines missions.

Arrowhead says it has always wanted to do this, but felt like there wasn't enough mission variety to implement it until recently.. "The intention is to make it more fun to liberate planets with your squad and deepen the Galactic War and Community Progression systems. We want liberating planets to feel unique and epic for everyone," Erikson explains.

Keep up to date with the most important stories and the best deals, as picked by the PC Gamer team.

Finally, there are changes coming at the player level too. Arrowhead is swapping out personal orders for a broader 'personal campaign progression' system so that you're less likely to be at objective odds with your teammates. But arguably the bigger change is an overhaul to how Super Destroyers work.

For this, not only is Arrowhead altering the ship module system to provide a more personalised progression system, it's also adding new types of ships entirely. The first ship is being worked on right now by Arrowhead's newly formed ship team: "Our intention is that each new ship will have their own unique progression paths, specializations and customizations."

Even this doesn't represent everything. Other planned changes include raising the level cap to 300, better enemy and player traversal, improvements to the economy, and more. It all sounds promising to me, and I particularly look forward to hearing about a new objective and not having it completed by the time I drop in.

Share:

More in PC

Someone made a copper gaming PC Frankensteined out of an old blowtorch and other assorted parts and is 'just going to let it tarnish over time'๐Ÿ–ฅ PC

Someone made a copper gaming PC Frankensteined out of an old blowtorch and other assorted parts and is 'just going to let it tarnish over time'

It lives!

PCNewsabout 3 hours ago
Wardogs Players Really Want You To Close The Doors โ€ฆ Or Else๐Ÿ–ฅ PC, Multi-platform

Wardogs Players Really Want You To Close The Doors โ€ฆ Or Else

The hottest game on PC right now is Wardogs(https://www.gamespot.com/games/wardogs/), the Battlefield-like mass multiplayer FPS by developer Bulkhead that's soaring up the Steam charts. While it may not be as hot as the game itself, the game's subreddit is full of hotheads demanding you do one teeny-tiny thing. Close. The. Doors. Behind. You. Released in a closed beta state in August 2026 before entering early access in September 2026, Wardogs has taken PC gaming by storm. It's not only the number-one trending game(https://steamdb.info/stats/trendingfollowers/) according to SteamDB, with an all-time peak of 428,666 concurrent players on September 13(https://steamdb.info/app/1867240/charts/), but it's also the fourth-most-played game on Steam(https://steamdb.info/charts/), trailing behind Counter-Strike 2, Dota 2, and PUBG: Battlegrounds. Folks can't get enough of being a dog of war. Something folks would love to get enough of, though? Players leaving those gosh-darn doors and gates open when venturing out onto the battlefield. All over the official Wardogs subreddit are a ton of players decrying the carelessness of other players when it comes to not closing doors and gates behind them. Redditor demonmit1 posted on September 14(https://www.reddit.com/r/WarDogs/comments/1wfvgws/stopbuildingsomanygates/), pleading for people to stop building so many gates and close the ones they open. "If you're helping build a FOB, pleaseโ€ฆ We only need one air locked gate for logistics," demonmit1 said. "No one closes them anyways, so adding more is not good. Stop it. If someone wants to leave the base, they can jump over a wall. They don't need to leave through a door they'll forget to close." https://www.reddit.com/r/WarDogs/comments/1wdpm7n/closeyourfobgatesplease/ "PSA: stop leaving my doors and gates open at my fobs," wrote Redditor novastar17 on September 12(https://www.reddit.com/r/WarDogs/comments/1we3cmr/psastopleavingmydoorsandgatesopenatmy/). "i have been trying to build mortar complexes and random allies come open doors and let enemies in to just wipe all of us while im busy building. stop that, thanks." "There should be upgraded doors / gates that auto shut after a few seconds," user GOpencyprep suggested on August 23(https://www.reddit.com/r/WarDogs/comments/1vwmx4f/spendingsomuchtimebuildingupafobonlyto/) in a very potty-mouthed Reddit post. "Or teammates who forget to close the door behind them should be fired into the sun...one or the other. Seriously though this is a problem." What these FOBBs, or Forward Operating Base builders(https://www.gamespot.com/articles/what-is-a-fob-in-wardogs-and-why-do-you-need-one/), are talking about are the doors and gates you can add when constructing bases that act as central operating hubs for your team. These FOBs allow you to create fortified defenses, as well as construct weapons and other armaments to keep your team ready for when the fighting gets particularly intense. Unfortunately, because the doors and the gates don't close behind you once opened, this gives the enemy team the opportunity to waltz in, shoot up the place, and leave as if they were invited in the first place. Even though only you and your teammates can open and close doors and gates, meaning the enemy can't just pry your FOB open, leaving any access point open leaves you, ahem, open to a raid. You can imagine how frustrating this would be. https://www.reddit.com/r/WarDogs/comments/1wf7gwf/friendlytutorialonhowtoclosedoors/ "While Servers are down CLOSE THE DAMN DOORS," Redditor xMrStonex put it bluntly on September 14(https://www.reddit.com/r/WarDogs/comments/1wfxm4d/whileserversaredownclosethedamndoors/). "Title. Thank you." "I get killed so often when using mortars or working on the FOB, because lazy people can't be bothered to close the door when they leave the FOB," AutomaticReach32 suggested on September 14(https://www.reddit.com/r/WarDogs/comments/1wfdd2x/paypeopleforclosingdoors/). "You can't force people to close the doors, but I think this could be helped with some monetary encouragement. Pay people if they close the door behind them! Nothing game changing, something modest like the revive / heal tips, $15 to players who close the door, reward good behavour!!" "I just have to say one thing," Icy-Sock-2388 said in the title of their September 5 Reddit post(https://www.reddit.com/r/WarDogs/comments/1w8fihl/ijusthavetosayonething/). "CLOSE THE FING DOORS! Countless times now I've meticulously spent tens of thousands to rapidly build a mortar, AA, and respawn fob...only for it to be taken by the enemy because they casually walked through the front door, past the multi-layered airlocks, into the tower airlock, and then into the fob airlock room because EVERY one of those doors was open." There have been some threats in the subreddit(https://www.reddit.com/r/WarDogs/comments/1wbhwt7/theonlyrealwayoffixingtheproblemofpeople/), too! It's really just people announcing that, if you leave a FOB door or gate open, you'll get a chest full of lead from your own team(https://www.reddit.com/r/WarDogs/comments/1wdpm7n/closeyourfobgatesplease/) if the enemy team hasn't pumped you full of it already. Clearly, no one wants to let the AC out and the enemies in. Speaking of being let in, Wardogs suffered brutal server queues(https://www.gamespot.com/articles/wardogs-has-a-massive-start-on-steam-but-players-face-brutal-sever-queues/) once it entered early access. Thankfully, Bulkhead released a hotfix that kinda-sorta addresses the long server wait times, but you may still encounter the dreaded WD-L014 Error Code. We've broken down how to get past that(https://www.gamespot.com/articles/how-to-fix-the-wardogs-wd-l014-error-code/) so you can be a dog of war again.

GameSpotNewsabout 3 hours ago
YouTuber gets classic Tomb Raider running on a chip that sips a mere 1 W of power๐Ÿ–ฅ PC

YouTuber gets classic Tomb Raider running on a chip that sips a mere 1 W of power

Who needs an RTX 5090, am I right?

๐ŸŽฎ YouTuber
PCNewsabout 3 hours ago