I expected Nvidia's keynote to leave out gaming entirely, but the RTX Spark's purported 5070-like performance is a pleasant surprise
🖥 PCNews
🎮 but the RTX Spark's purported 5070-like performance#Hardware

I expected Nvidia's keynote to leave out gaming entirely, but the RTX Spark's purported 5070-like performance is a pleasant surprise

PC Gamer RSS FeedJess Kinghorn5 min read(3 months ago)

Overview & Key Takeaways

Simple things please simple minds.

It's not lost on me that Nvidia isn't a primarily gaming-focused company anymore. On the off-chance you've been living under a cool mossy rock for the last few years, Nvidia were once primarily known for their powerful graphics cards, but are now very much all-in on AI.

Why? Well, let me put it this way: during the first quarter of 2026, the data centre segment of Nvidia's business raked in $75.2 billion alone. Supplying the AI industry with hardware has proven incredibly lucrative for the company, leading Nvidia to become the world's first $5 trillion company last year.

So, imagine my surprise when at this year's Computex, Nvidia finally unveiled the much-leaked RTX Spark. Billed as a "superchip," machine learning applications definitely feature in the elevator pitch—that's hardly surprising because, as our Jeremy so expertly explains, it is "basically a rebadge of the GB10 superchip in the DGX Spark desktop AI box that it launched in October last year."

Latest Videos From

However, the full hardware sell isn't only geared towards AI agents but flesh and blood gamers too, promising 100 fps at 1440p in the latest games. In other words, we could be looking at performance comparable to the RTX 5070 GPU from a mobile SoC.

The company is also apparently working with all the anti-cheat vendors to make competitive games work on RTX Spark, going as far as to tell us, "We are working closely with game developers to ensure all the top games run great." It's such a simple thing, but it sure is nice to hear Nvidia talk about gaming again.

(Image credit: I-Hwa Cheng / AFP via Getty Images)

As someone who desperately tried to keep a bulky Acer Aspire 5755 G alive for well over a decade, I'm also definitely intrigued by what the RTX Spark could offer laptop gamers.

Now, if you spend any amount of time pining after the best gaming laptops like I do, you'll know you can already get mobile RTX 5070 GPUs. Unfortunately, this form factor often has some significant drawbacks. Basically, if the laptop chassis ain't bulky, it will be hot, and either way under load the fan will likely sound like it's threatening to take off.

Keep up to date with the most important stories and the best deals, as picked by the PC Gamer team.

On top of that, the battery life may be somewhat lacking, giving you a scant few hours of unplugged gaming. That all goes without saying anything about the price, but I'll get into why I'm doubting RTX Spark machines will save our wallets from devastation a little later.

On the subject of practical matters, the pre-release RTX Spark machines we've seen so far have all been pretty sleek. I will also take a gaming battery life that Nvidia purports to be "better than anything you've seen before on RTX laptops."

(Image credit: Nvidia)

That said, it definitely doesn't hurt to maintain some showfloor scepticism for hardware hypemen. Firstly, it's worth noting that the aforementioned RTX 5070-level performance is based on an early specs role call, which lists 'up to' 20 Grace CPU cores, 6144 RTX Blackwell GPU cores, and 128 GB of unified LPDDR5x memory.

To dissect the use of 'up to', the RTX Spark isn't just a single laptop processor but a full lineup of notebook SoCs that we'll start seeing more of later this year. Mark Aevermann, the consumer product marketing lead of RTX Spark, told our Dave that over time we will eventually see about "30 laptops and over ten or so desktops," all attacking different price points.

(Image credit: Nvidia)

Memory configurations will range from 16 GB to 128 GB, and based on that detail alone I'm expecting most RTX Spark machines to be too rich for my blood. Back in the day, my Acer Aspire 5755 G cost me a little over £700—in light of the memory supply crisis, I would be extremely surprised if any RTX Spark machines rock up around that price point.

But perhaps I could be persuaded to save my pennies. Our Dave went hands-on with a native Arm build of Alan Wake 2 on a pre-release version of the Surface Laptop Ultra, hardware that Microsoft has apparently been working on with Nvidia for about three years. Though a very tightly controlled demo on the showfloor at Computex, Dave highlights "This is still a DirectX 12 game, with a native Arm port running smoothly on this thin-and-light gaming laptop without blowing a gale out the back."

(Image credit: Future)

Now, not every studio can invest the resources to create a native Arm build, so in those instances there's Prism emulation. Jo Vivoli, the senior manager in Nvidia's tech marketing team, told Dave, "If you're a developer and your game is running through an emulator, we're going to work with you to make sure it's a good experience. If you want to make a native Arm build, we're going to work with you to make sure it's a good experience."

Another Microsoft representative also said "We've been looking at the 200 largest, most used creative applications, most used games and we're on track to have those working in time for launch."

(Image credit: Nvidia)

That sort of support represents a huge amount of investment in Nvidia's new PC platform from multiple partners. We already know the likes of MediaTek, Microsoft, and MSI (mm-hm), have been working with Nvidia on RTX Spark machines for years now—once the ball drops later this year, it will get rolling with a fair bit of momentum behind it. As exciting as all of that is though, I wouldn't be surprised if the price of an RTX Spark machine leaves many PC Gamers in the dust.

Best gaming laptop 2026

Share:

More in PC

Someone made a copper gaming PC Frankensteined out of an old blowtorch and other assorted parts and is 'just going to let it tarnish over time'🖥 PC

Someone made a copper gaming PC Frankensteined out of an old blowtorch and other assorted parts and is 'just going to let it tarnish over time'

It lives!

PCNewsabout 4 hours ago
Wardogs Players Really Want You To Close The Doors … Or Else🖥 PC, Multi-platform

Wardogs Players Really Want You To Close The Doors … Or Else

The hottest game on PC right now is Wardogs(https://www.gamespot.com/games/wardogs/), the Battlefield-like mass multiplayer FPS by developer Bulkhead that's soaring up the Steam charts. While it may not be as hot as the game itself, the game's subreddit is full of hotheads demanding you do one teeny-tiny thing. Close. The. Doors. Behind. You. Released in a closed beta state in August 2026 before entering early access in September 2026, Wardogs has taken PC gaming by storm. It's not only the number-one trending game(https://steamdb.info/stats/trendingfollowers/) according to SteamDB, with an all-time peak of 428,666 concurrent players on September 13(https://steamdb.info/app/1867240/charts/), but it's also the fourth-most-played game on Steam(https://steamdb.info/charts/), trailing behind Counter-Strike 2, Dota 2, and PUBG: Battlegrounds. Folks can't get enough of being a dog of war. Something folks would love to get enough of, though? Players leaving those gosh-darn doors and gates open when venturing out onto the battlefield. All over the official Wardogs subreddit are a ton of players decrying the carelessness of other players when it comes to not closing doors and gates behind them. Redditor demonmit1 posted on September 14(https://www.reddit.com/r/WarDogs/comments/1wfvgws/stopbuildingsomanygates/), pleading for people to stop building so many gates and close the ones they open. "If you're helping build a FOB, please… We only need one air locked gate for logistics," demonmit1 said. "No one closes them anyways, so adding more is not good. Stop it. If someone wants to leave the base, they can jump over a wall. They don't need to leave through a door they'll forget to close." https://www.reddit.com/r/WarDogs/comments/1wdpm7n/closeyourfobgatesplease/ "PSA: stop leaving my doors and gates open at my fobs," wrote Redditor novastar17 on September 12(https://www.reddit.com/r/WarDogs/comments/1we3cmr/psastopleavingmydoorsandgatesopenatmy/). "i have been trying to build mortar complexes and random allies come open doors and let enemies in to just wipe all of us while im busy building. stop that, thanks." "There should be upgraded doors / gates that auto shut after a few seconds," user GOpencyprep suggested on August 23(https://www.reddit.com/r/WarDogs/comments/1vwmx4f/spendingsomuchtimebuildingupafobonlyto/) in a very potty-mouthed Reddit post. "Or teammates who forget to close the door behind them should be fired into the sun...one or the other. Seriously though this is a problem." What these FOBBs, or Forward Operating Base builders(https://www.gamespot.com/articles/what-is-a-fob-in-wardogs-and-why-do-you-need-one/), are talking about are the doors and gates you can add when constructing bases that act as central operating hubs for your team. These FOBs allow you to create fortified defenses, as well as construct weapons and other armaments to keep your team ready for when the fighting gets particularly intense. Unfortunately, because the doors and the gates don't close behind you once opened, this gives the enemy team the opportunity to waltz in, shoot up the place, and leave as if they were invited in the first place. Even though only you and your teammates can open and close doors and gates, meaning the enemy can't just pry your FOB open, leaving any access point open leaves you, ahem, open to a raid. You can imagine how frustrating this would be. https://www.reddit.com/r/WarDogs/comments/1wf7gwf/friendlytutorialonhowtoclosedoors/ "While Servers are down CLOSE THE DAMN DOORS," Redditor xMrStonex put it bluntly on September 14(https://www.reddit.com/r/WarDogs/comments/1wfxm4d/whileserversaredownclosethedamndoors/). "Title. Thank you." "I get killed so often when using mortars or working on the FOB, because lazy people can't be bothered to close the door when they leave the FOB," AutomaticReach32 suggested on September 14(https://www.reddit.com/r/WarDogs/comments/1wfdd2x/paypeopleforclosingdoors/). "You can't force people to close the doors, but I think this could be helped with some monetary encouragement. Pay people if they close the door behind them! Nothing game changing, something modest like the revive / heal tips, $15 to players who close the door, reward good behavour!!" "I just have to say one thing," Icy-Sock-2388 said in the title of their September 5 Reddit post(https://www.reddit.com/r/WarDogs/comments/1w8fihl/ijusthavetosayonething/). "CLOSE THE FING DOORS! Countless times now I've meticulously spent tens of thousands to rapidly build a mortar, AA, and respawn fob...only for it to be taken by the enemy because they casually walked through the front door, past the multi-layered airlocks, into the tower airlock, and then into the fob airlock room because EVERY one of those doors was open." There have been some threats in the subreddit(https://www.reddit.com/r/WarDogs/comments/1wbhwt7/theonlyrealwayoffixingtheproblemofpeople/), too! It's really just people announcing that, if you leave a FOB door or gate open, you'll get a chest full of lead from your own team(https://www.reddit.com/r/WarDogs/comments/1wdpm7n/closeyourfobgatesplease/) if the enemy team hasn't pumped you full of it already. Clearly, no one wants to let the AC out and the enemies in. Speaking of being let in, Wardogs suffered brutal server queues(https://www.gamespot.com/articles/wardogs-has-a-massive-start-on-steam-but-players-face-brutal-sever-queues/) once it entered early access. Thankfully, Bulkhead released a hotfix that kinda-sorta addresses the long server wait times, but you may still encounter the dreaded WD-L014 Error Code. We've broken down how to get past that(https://www.gamespot.com/articles/how-to-fix-the-wardogs-wd-l014-error-code/) so you can be a dog of war again.

GameSpotNewsabout 4 hours ago
YouTuber gets classic Tomb Raider running on a chip that sips a mere 1 W of power🖥 PC

YouTuber gets classic Tomb Raider running on a chip that sips a mere 1 W of power

Who needs an RTX 5090, am I right?

🎮 YouTuber
PCNewsabout 5 hours ago